Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs & Washington Legal Foundation v. Von Eschenbach’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.3d 470 · 2006
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
August 2007
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Troxel v. Granville · Meyer v. State of Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“established procedures designed to expedite the development, evaluation, and marketing of new therapies intended to treat persons with life-threatening and severely-debilitating illnesses, especially where no satisfactory alternative therapy exists.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“colonial days, and long afterward, consumers ... were their own food and drug inspectors,””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“It cannot be disputed that the Due Process Clause protects an interest in life as well as an interest in refusing life-saving medical treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.