Morris v. Schroder Capital Management International’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.3d 525 · 2006
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders · Whidbee v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc. · Petrosino v. Bell Atlantic · Lucente v. International Business Machines Corp. · Pena v. Brattleboro Retreat
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the absence of authoritative state court interpretations of the state statute; (2) the importance of the issue to the state, and whether the question implicates issues of state public policy; and (3) the capacity of certification to resolve the litigation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determinative questions of New York law . . . for which no controlling precedent of the [New York] Court of Appeals exists”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the capacity of certification to resolve the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.