United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.3d 793 · 2006
Citation profile
104
cited by 104 later decisions
7
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
14 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Chimel v. California · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Mares · Cupp v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ a] warrantless arrest is lawful if at the moment the arrest was made, the officers had probable cause to make it — -if at that moment the facts and circum stances within their knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [defendant] had committed or was committing an offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the presence of gun powder on his hands was relevant evidence that Johnson (or merely time) could have eventually removed or destroyed, if his arrest was valid, the performance of the gun powder residue test was lawful, and the admission of the results at trial was proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.