Filiaggi v. Bagley’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.3d 851 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Edwards v. Arizona · Lindh v. Murphy · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Dusky v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]vidence of a defendant's irrational behavior, his demeanor at trial, and any prior medical opinion on competence to stand trial are all relevant in determining whether further inquiry is required, but ... even one of these factors standing alone may, in some circumstances, be sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. Bogan“whether a reasonable judge, situated as was the trial court judge whose failure to conduct an evidentiary hearing is being reviewed, should have experienced doubt with respect to competency to stand trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. Bogan“the state court's legal standard for determining whether a defendant is competent is not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carter v. Bogan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.