Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 FSUPP2D 98 - Taylor v. Swartwout

Taylor v. Swartwout’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

8 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom, can lead to only one conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To fall under the protection of the statute, the disclosed facts must be of a 'highly personal or intimate nature.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.