Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 NE2D 576 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pinkerton v. State · Matthews v. State · Loza v. State · Smith v. State · 179 Ind. App. 143 - McFarland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person not standing in the relation of parent, child or spouse to another person who has committed a crime or is a fugitive from justice who, with intent to hinder the apprehension or punishment of the other person, harbors, conceals or otherwise assists the person commits assisting a criminal, a Class A misdemean- or. However, the offense is: (1) a Class D felony if the person assisted has committed a Class B, Class C or Class D felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Generally, the crime of assisting a eriminal was "intended to cover the situation where a person did not actively participate in the crime itself but after the commission of the crime aided the criminal." (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.