Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 NE2D 582 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2017

15 state decisions

501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tindell · 177 Ind. App. 47 - State v. Cox · State v. New · State v. Lee · 164 Ind. App. 391 - State v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[from an order granting a motion to suppress evidence, if the ultimate effect of the order is to preclude further prosecution.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the order is tantamount to dismissal and therefore appealable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “appealable as a final judgment under subsection (5)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.