Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 N.E.2d 94 - Poe v. State

Poe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2007

13 state decisions

90198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Rasmussen · Moore v. State · Cyrus v. State · Medsker v. State · Thompson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The defense of intoxication is defined by law as follows: It is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct did so while he was intoxicated, if the intoxication resulted from the introduction of a substance into his body, without his consent or when he did not know that the substance might cause intoxication. Voluntary intoxication is a defense only to the extent that it negates an element of the offense referred to by the phrase 'with intent to' or 'with an intention to.' Therefore voluntary intoxication is not a defense to Robbery, Count I, or Attempted Murder, Count II or the included offenses in Count II of Battery or Criminal Recklessness.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for an unreasonable period of time, under the cireumstances, the filing of charges following [Roberts'] arrest and incarceration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.