State v. Fan’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2016
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Kolender v. Lawson · Miller v. California · Screws v. United States · New York v. Ferber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The elements of the crime of use of minors to engage in sexual performance are: 1st. [S.S.] and [T.T.] were minors at the time of the defendants’ act. Minor means any person under the age of 18. 2nd. Defendants, or each of them, promoted, employed, used or permitted the minors to engage in posing and modeling, alone or with others, in any sexual performance. I will now define promote. Promote means to produce, direct, publish, manufacture, issue or advertise. I will now define sexual performance. That means any play dance or other exhibition presented before an audience or for the purpose of video or mechanical reproduction which depicts sexual conduct. I will now define sexual conduct. That means the following: A. An act of sexual intercourse, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including genital to genital, anal to genital or oral to genital intercourse; or, B. Masturbation or lewd exhibition of the genitals; or, C. Physical contact or simulated physical contact with the clothed or unclothed pubic areas or buttock of the human male or female or the breasts of the female, whether alone or between members of the same or opposite sex, in an act of apparent sexual stimulation or gratification. 3rd. Defendants knew or had reason to know that such intended conduct was a sexual performance. 4th. Defendants act took place on or about the 20th day of August, 1988, in Crow Wing county. If you find that these four elements have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, defendants a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borden“It is unlawful for a person to promote, employ, use or permit a minor to engage in or assist others to engage in posing or modeling alone or with others in any sexual performance if the person knows or has reason to know that the conduct intended is a sexual performance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Borden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.