SCHNEDLER v. LEE’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 135 S. Ct. 2584 - Obergefell v. Hodges · 193 Wis. 2d 649 - In Re Custody of HSHK · In Re the Marriage of Smith · Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Sapulpa · E.N.O. v. L.M.M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the supervision of the courts over the custody and welfare of children is of itself equitable, and not strictly legal, in nature”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SCHNEDLER v. LEE · GUZMAN v. GUZMAN“acted in a parental role for a length of time sufficient to have established a meaningful emotional relationship with the child”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SCHNEDLER v. LEE · GUZMAN v. GUZMAN“). But, in the context of same-sex parentage, we have thus far allowed a non-biological parent standing to assert parental rights only in loco parentis . We have not presumed parentage for the non-biological parent in same-sex couples, but allowed the pursuit and validation of such rights only when there exists some prior agreement between the couple regarding the same--and only where the same-sex couple was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SCHNEDLER v. LEE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.