Grindling v. State.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We consider a court's conclusions of law regarding a petition for post-conviction relief de novo[.]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Meyer v. State · Chatman v. State

2. “To demonstrate that trial counsel is constitutionally ineffective, a defendant must demonstrate '1) that there were specific errors or omissions reflecting counsel's lack of skill, judgment, or diligence; and 2) that such errors or omissions resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Warner v. State

3. “The burden of establishing ineffective assistance rests with the petitioner and can only be met by demonstrating specific errors or omissions resulted in the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a meritorious defense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Warner v. State