Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 PA 17 - Moore Estate

Moore Estate’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City Borough · Commonwealth v. McHugh · Treaster v. Union Township · Huddy's Estate · Palmer v. O'Hara

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the power of appointment was created in 1954, the eventual appointees had no interest whatsoever in the trust, either present or future, vested or contingent . . . and they did not obtain any legal or equitable interest in the trust until the power’s exercise upon Edith Moore’s death in 1965. To hold that there was a ‘transfer ... to’ the appointees prior to the passage and effective date of the charitable exemption statute would be to ascribe a highly artificial meaning to the statute in the absence of any apparent legislative intent that we do so. We therefore conclude to the contrary that there was no statutory ‘transfer ... to’ the appointees until the date of the exercise of the power.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In assessing these competing arguments, it is important to bear in mind that this appeal poses a single, albeit important issue of statutory construction, to wit: when did the ‘transfer ... to’ the appointees take place. In answering this question we must of course be guided by the text of the charitable exemption statute and by a consideration of the public policies which it seeks to foster.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.