Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

445 So. 2d 341

Florida Bar v. Hazen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 2, 1984

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1984-02-02

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-02-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2002

12 state decisions

70198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Florida Bar filed an eight-count complaint against Hazen, charging him with violating Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4) and DR 9-102(A). The referee appointed by this Court held a hearing, at which time the bar dismissed three of the counts. The referee recommends that Hazen be found not guilty of two of the counts and that he be found guilty of the remaining three counts. As to discipline, the referee recommends that Hazen be suspended for six months from the date of his initial temporary suspension (February 15, 1982)* and thereafter until he proves his rehabilitation pursuant to rule 11.10(3).

¶2Neither Hazen nor the bar has petitioned for review of the referee’s report and recommendations. We have examined the record and adopt both the report and the recommended penalty. Costs in the amount of $3,883.57 are hereby taxed against Hazen.

¶3It is so ordered.

BOYD, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

¶4 The period of suspension, therefore, has already expired. We note, however, that the temporary suspension has never been lifted.

/445/so2d/341 · .json · Public domain