Tweed v. State

¶1This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has filed a handwritten letter which we have treated as a supplemental brief. Having reviewed the Andersbrief, appellant’s pro se brief and the record on appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to the judgment and sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.