445 So. 2d 564 - Cagle v. Lawson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 360 So. 2d 936 - Semo Aviation, Inc. v. Southeastern Airways Corp. · 431 So. 2d 499 - Hoffman v. Chandler · 435 So. 2d 1198 - View-All, Inc. v. United Parcel Service · 402 So. 2d 903 - Williams v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Recently, in View-All, Inc. v. United Parcel Service , 435 So.2d 1198 (Ala. 1983), this Court, quoting Professor Moore, summarized the correct constitutional requirements in this area: "`The first requirement is that there must be some minimum contact with the state which results from an affirmative act of the defendant. But it is not necessary that the defendant have been in the state or that it have had agents there. "`In addition to some minimum contact with the state, it must be fair and reasonable to require the defendant to come into the state and defend that action. . . . [I]n determining what is fair and reasonable, the court may consider factors associated with the doctrine of forum non conveniens, but need not give them overriding importance. . . . "`Based as they are on notions of fairness and reasonableness, the Supreme Court decisions do not permit a simple generalization of the rule pertaining to in personam jurisdiction over foreign corporations. . . . "`If there are substantial contacts with the state, for example a substantial and continuing business, and if the cause of action arises out of the business done in the state, jurisdiction will be sustained. If there are substantial contacts with the state, but the cause of action does not arise out of these contacts, jurisdiction may be sustained. But if there is a minimum of contacts, and the cause of action arises out of the contacts, it will normally be fair and reasonable to sustain jurisdiction. If there i”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where, as here, there is a minimum of contacts, and the cause of action arises out of the contacts, we consider the quality and nature of the activity in this state in order to determine whether maintenance of the suit will offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ Williams v. Barrington Ford, Inc., 402 So.2d 903 (Ala.1981). Also relevant are the foreseeability by the defendant of being sued in Alabama as a result of his activity in this state and the level of inconvenience to the defendant in defending the suit.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(I) otherwise having some minimum contacts with this state and, under the circumstances, it is fair and reasonable to require the person to come to this state to defend an action. The minimum contacts referred to in this subdivision (I) shall be deemed sufficient, notwithstanding a failure to satisfy the requirement of subdivisions (A)-(H) of this subsection (2), so long as the prosecution of the action against a person in this state is not inconsistent with the constitution of this state or the Constitution of the United States."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.