¶1Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).
445 So. 2d 627
Ricco v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-08
Relies on 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · Dolan v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-02-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2000
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →