¶1Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not admitting the proffered testimony which would have been cumulative. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 320 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
445 So. 2d 701
Kelley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 24, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-24
Relies on 320 So. 2d 420 - Smith v. State · Sheppard v. State
Decided 1984-02-24