Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

445 So. 2d 763

State v. Berry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1984

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1984-01-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1986

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Manuel · State v. Bruno · State v. Haynes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-01-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CIACCIO, Judge.

¶1Defendant, Kevin Berry, appealed to this Court from a ruling of the district court which revoked his probation. No motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed in this Court. It has come to our attention, however, that defendant has no right of appeal from the revocation of his probation. Such a ruling can be reviewed by the court only under its supervisory jurisdiction. State v. Manuel, 349 So.2d 882 (La.1977); State v. Haynes, 255 La. 52, 229 So.2d 697 (1969); State v. Bruno, 253 La. 669, 219 So.2d 490 (1969). cf. La. Const. of 1974 Art. 5 Sec. 10, La.C.Cr.P. Arts. 912 and 912.1.

¶2On December 12, 1983, we issued an order requesting appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. Neither party responded to this order.

¶3Accordingly, in light of the above cited authorities, this appeal is dismissed ex pro-prio motu.

¶4APPEAL DISMISSED.

/445/so2d/763 · .json · Public domain