Price v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 302 So. 2d 5 - Imperial v. Hardy · 345 So. 2d 1154 - Odom v. Odom · 415 So. 2d 259 - Buchanan v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Notice required for the exercise of jurisdiction over a person outside this state shall be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, and may be: (1) By personal delivery outside of this state in the manner prescribed for service of process within this state; or (2) By registered or certified mail; or (3)(a) If the party is a nonresident or absentee who cannot be served by the methods provided in paragraphs (1) and (2) above, either personally or through an agent for service of process, and who has made no general appearance, the court shall appoint an attorney at law to represent him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.