Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1982
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 168 Tex. Crim. 606 - Mitchell v. State · Glenn v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 35 - Robertson v. State · Neal v. State · Suzuki v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““He is guilty of forgery who without lawful authority, and with intent to injure or defraud, shall make a false instrument in writing purporting to be the act of another, in such manner that the false instrument so made would (if the same were true) have created, increased, diminished, discharged or defeated any pecuniary obligation, or would have transferred, or in any manner have affected any property whatever.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.