Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 U.S. 573 - Payton v. New York

Payton v. New York’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12,396
cited by 12,396 later decisions
197
cited 197 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3,068 federal appellate · 586 district · 5,916 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12,396 later decisions (197 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), Anderson v. Creighton (1987)

3,068 federal appellate · 586 district · 5,916 state decisions — followed in 50 states

3.6k019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3052 · 18 U.S.C. § 3109

Relies on Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California

Cited together with Katz v. United States · Steagald v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Johnson v. United States · Terry v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12,396 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    650 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If there is sufficient evidence of a citizen’s participation in a felony to persuade a judicial officer that his arrest is justified, it is constitutionally reasonable to require him to open his doors to the officers of the law. Thus, for Fourth Amendment purposes, an arrest warrant founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to enter a dwelling in which the suspect lives when there is reason to believe the suspect is within.”
    41 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a grave concern, not only to the individual but to a society which chooses to dwell in reasonable security and freedom from surveillance.”
    37 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.