In Re Christopherson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1123 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings Ass'n · Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Louis · In Re Frances Scarborough · In Re Wetherbee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“encourage and sustain a flow of affordable capital into the home lending market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Lister
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.