United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
446 F.2d 118 · 1971
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1977), United States v. Bermudez (1975)
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Allen v. United States · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n · Central Railroad v. Pennsylvania · United States v. Fioravanti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). See also United States v. Martinez, 446 F.2d 118, 120 (2d Cir.1971) (“[W]e will not place an arbitrary time limit on how long a juiy must deliberate before an Allen charge is appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.