Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.2d 1209 - James M. Walsh v. Philip J. Picard, Superintendent, Etc.

James M. Walsh v. Philip J. Picard, Superintendent, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.2d 1209 · 1971

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
August 1982
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Cannon v. United States · United States v. Tateo · Rinaldi v. Yeager

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Massachusetts procedure does not permit the state to reopen the question of sentence on its own initiative. Were it to do so, it would of course violate the proscription against double jeopardy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.