Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.2d 1366 - Donald R. Stacy v. John D. Williams, Danny E. Cupit, and Laurance R. Mitlin, Intervenors-Appellants v. M. M. Roberts

Donald R. Stacy v. John D. Williams, Danny E. Cupit, and Laurance R. Mitlin, Intervenors-Appellants v. M. M. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.2d 1366 · 1971

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 1991 · most notably Knighton v. Watkins (1980), Bond v. Stanton (1980)

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

360197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · Bell v. School Board of Powhatan County, Virginia · 306 F. Supp. 963 - Stacy v. Williams · Stacy v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(e) Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment. A motion to alter or amend the judgment shall be served not later than 10 days after entry of the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.