Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

446 F.2d 1404

Docket No. 71-1178.

Recide v. Richardson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 16, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-08-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1971

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John S. Edmunds, Robert Gilbert Johnston, Chief, Civ. Div., Andrew C. Levin, Associate Counsel, Legal Aid Society, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants.

¶2Robert K. Fukuda, U. S. Atty., L. Patrick Gray, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, Judith S. Ziss, Kathryn H. Baldwin, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before HAMLEY, MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4*1405PER CURIAM:

¶5In our view the Complaint, Summons, Memorandum of Authorities, Order and Application for the Convening of a Three-Judge Court should be deemed filed in the District Court on September 16, 1970, the date on which they were originally tendered for filing, since rejection of filing on that date was unwarranted.

¶6The filing was, then, timely and dismissal of the case was error.

¶7Reversed and remanded with instructions that the order of dismissal be vacated, the filing date of the documents in question be shown as September 16, 1970, and for further proceedings.

/446/f2d/1404 · .json · Public domain