Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.2d 571 - United States v. Chaney

United States v. Chaney’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.2d 571 · 1971

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
5
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably United States v. Isaacs (1974), United States v. Dansker (1976)

29 federal appellate · 6 district · 5 state decisions

28019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Griffin v. California · Williams v. United States · Moore v. United States · United States v. Allard · Fitzsimmons v. Yeager

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “such as would lead the jury to conclude that the prosecutor was commenting on the failure of the accused to testify.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An examination of all the evidence, including that recounted above, leads us to the conclusion that the evidence against the defendant[s] * * made out a strong enough case to permit a jury to find the defendant[s] guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.