Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.2d 806 - David E. Roth, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Regents of State Colleges and Roger E. Guiles

David E. Roth, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Regents of State Colleges and Roger E. Guiles’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.2d 806 · 1971

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2000 · most notably Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth (1972), Jeffries v. Turkey Run Consolidated School District (1974)

50 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions

7601971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Goldberg v. Kelly · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district court properly considered the substantial adverse effect non-retention is likely to have upon the career interests of an individual professor and concluded, after balancing it against the governmental interest in unembarrassed exercise of discretion in pruning a faculty, that affording the professor a glimpse at the reasons and a minimal opportunity to test them is an appropriate protection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “as a prophylactic against non-retention decisions improperly motivated by exercise of protected rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the private interest that has been affected by governmental action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.