Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.2d 833 - Crossen v. Breckenridge

Crossen v. Breckenridge’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.2d 833 · 1971

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
February 2003
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2003 · most notably Roe v. Wade (1973), Steffel v. Thompson (1974)

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

3501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Baker v. Carr · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Flast v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘Whether the relief sought is legal or equitable, injunctive or declaratory, it must be within the framework of a true case or controversy capable of meaningful adjudication.’ ”). 34 . For purposes of its Article III standing analysis, the Court will assume, arguendo, that Ohio physicians could face civil liability, despite the fact that HB 351’s ban on the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Constitution requires litigants to subject themselves to the possible harm of a criminal prosecution before seeking relief from an allegedly unconstitutional statute * * * when actual interference with protected rights is alleged or shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.