Spinelli v. Goss’s Empirical Analysis
446 F.3d 159 · 2006
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 50 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Mathirampuzha v. Potter (2008), Wilson
9 federal appellate · 50 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on V. C O Churner · McCarthy v. Madigan · Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management · Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration · Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“her administrative complaint. 29 U.S.C. § 794a(a)(1). In Spinelli , the plaintiff was not aggrieved by a final disposition because he”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he district court ... should have dismissed [the Plaintiff's] Rehabilitation Act claim for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedy” because "[s]uch jurisdictional exhaustion, as we have called it, may not be excused”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since there was no administrative complaint and thus no final disposition of one, the district court lacked jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.