United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
446 F.3d 671 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2024
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hamling v. United States · United States v. Lanier · Dennis v. United States · McBoyle v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A material statement is one that has a natural tendency to influence, or that is capable of affecting, a government function.” United States v. Moore, 446 F.3d 671 , 681 (7th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Henry, 164 F.3d 1304 , 1308 & n. 2 (10th Cir.1999) (defining materiality in the context of 18 U.S.C. § 1920 as a statement that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.