Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.3d 735 - Scaife v. Cook County

Scaife v. Cook County’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.3d 735 · 2006

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
September 2022
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Coleman v. Donahoe (2012), Burks v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (2006)

28 federal appellate ·

420200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · McKenzie v. Illinois Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) he is a member of a protected class; (2) he was meeting his employer's legitimate expectations at the time of the alleged adverse action; (3) he was subjected to an adverse employment action; and (4) the employer treated similarly situated employees not in the protected class more favorably.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.