Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 F.3d 821 - United States v. Ault

United States v. Ault’s Empirical Analysis

446 F.3d 821 · 2006

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2023

16 federal appellate ·

120200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Pirani · Vidrio-Aleman v. United States · Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · United States v. Lawrence

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Guidelines provide that this enhancement “should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, comment, (n.3). “[T]he dangerous weapon enhancement applies if the firearm is present during ‘relevant conduct,’ as defined by U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(2), not merely during the offense of conviction.” United States v. Savage, 414 F.3d 964, 966 (8th Cir.2005).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in a drug distribution case, quantities and types of drugs not specified in the count of conviction are to be included in determining the offense level if they were part of the same course of conduct or part of a common scheme or plan as the count of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Factors to be considered in making this determination include the similarity, regularity, and temporal proximity of the charged and uncharged conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.