Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

446 F.3d 922

Docket No. 03-56259.

Padilla v. Lever

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 2006.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2006-04-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2006

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-04-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Thomas A. Saenz, Esq., Steven J. Reyes, Esq., Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund (MALDEF) Voting Rights Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

¶2Benjamin P. De Mayo, Esq., Wendy J. Phillips, Esq., Orange County Counsel’s Office Hall of Administration, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶3Michael Strumwasser, Esq., Strumwas-ser & Woocher, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant.

¶4Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

¶5ORDER

¶6Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

/446/f3d/922 · .json · Public domain