Alford v. Haner’s Empirical Analysis
446 F.3d 935 · 2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2022
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Maryland v. Pringle · Devenpeck v. Alford · Landes Construction Co. v. Royal Bank of Canada · Barry v. Fowler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if the district court makes a legal error in applying the standard for a new trial or the record contains no evidence that can support the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.