446 F. Supp. 828 - Smith v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mapp v. Ohio · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Boyd v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“You are hereby suspended for a period of 10 working days for the violation of the Departmental Rules and Regulations, Section 101.48. A copy of the Internal Affairs Investigation Report is attached for your information. As per to our discussion of this date any further violation of the departmental rules and regulations will lead to dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Price“when alternative personnel actions . . . would not be deemed sufficient, appropriate or in the best interest of the City Service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Price“(f)ailure to comply with published rules, regulations, or ordinances of the City or any department thereof”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Price
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.