Kemp v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. State · Smith v. State · Lindley v. State · Rice v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Incompetency of counsel revolves around the particular facts of each case and the standard of review on this issue is the mockery of justice test as modified by the adequate legal representation standard. This Court will not speculate as to what may have been the most advantageous strategy in a particular case. Isolated poor strategy, bad tactics, or inexperience does not necessarily amount to ineffective counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“to determine if and how a defense attorney's 'inadequacies' have harmed the defendant at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.