Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 So. 2d 301 - Corbello v. Sutton

446 So. 2d 301 - Corbello v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 797 So. 2d 656 - Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. (2001), 655 So. 2d 292 - State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT. (1995)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 401 So. 2d 389 - Jordan v. Sutton · Landry v. Mutual Life Ins. · System Federation No. 59 of Railway Employees' Department of American Federation of Labor v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was not intended to supersede the specific provisions of other administrative acts, or to supersede the rights and remedies created under those acts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an absence of statutory provision for the time delays within which the petition [for judicial review of an administrative order] must be filed. The equitable doctrine of laches, therefore, has no application in such cases.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no prescription other than that established by legislation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.