Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 446 SW2D 620 - Grant v. State

Grant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
June 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1996

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

1501969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stovall v. Denno · State v. Grant · State v. Grant · State v. Keeney · United States v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1957 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 , commenting upon the criticism of the practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, the court made it clear that `a claimed violation of due process of law in the conduct of a confrontation depends upon the totality of the circumstances surrounding it, * * *.' 388 U.S., l.c. 302, 87 S.Ct. at p. 1972 . * * *" "While there was no emergency situation there was an urgency in the circumstances of Grant's case which justified the procedure adopted by the officers. A heinous crime had been committed. The officers had the responsibility of ascertaining the identity of the criminal. Their attention having been directed to appellant, and he having been taken into custody, it was important in those early moments of the investigation that he either be detained as the suspect or released and the investigation continued without interruption in the effort to identify and find the attacker. * * * In the totality of the circumstances there was no unfairness or unnecessary risking of irreparable mistaken identification."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1957 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 , commenting upon the criticism of the practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification, the court made it clear that `a claimed violation of due process of law in the conduct of a confrontation depends upon the totality of the circumstances surrounding it, * * *.' 388 U.S., l.c. 302, 87 S.Ct. at p. 1972 . * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.