Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 A2D 794 - State v. Lindsey

State v. Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2024

8 state decisions

4019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Heald · State v. Goodrich · State v. Wallace · French v. French

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Four eyewitnesses testified at trial. Each independently asserted that the defendant had pointed a gun at the De-Witts’ home on the afternoon of December 19, 1976. Thus, substantial evidence of the crime charged against the defendant existed in addition to the DeWitts’ testimony that defendant had previously threatened them. The danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant as a result of admitting the challenged evidence was therefore slight at best.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “4. If the State pleads and proves that a Class B, C, D or E crime was committed with the use of a dangerous weapon then the sentencing class for such crime is one class higher than it would otherwise be....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.