Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 F.2d 1158 - Jean Sinclair v. John W. Turner, Warden, Utah State Prison

Jean Sinclair v. John W. Turner, Warden, Utah State Prison’s Empirical Analysis

447 F.2d 1158 · 1971

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
4
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably United States v. Honneus (1974), Brinlee v. Crisp (1979)

44 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

46019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Pointer v. Texas · Bumper v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Federal habeas corpus does not serve as an additional appeal from State court conviction. Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 , [ 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 ] (1963). Sufficiency of evidence to support a State conviction raises no Federal constitutional question, and cannot be considered in Federal habeas proceedings by State prisoners. Linebarger v. State of Oklahoma, 404 F.2d 1092 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 938 [ 89 S.Ct. 1218 , 22 L.Ed.2d 470 ] (1969); Williams v. Wainwright, 414 F.2d 806 (5th Cir. 1969). The guilt or innocence of an accused person when determined by a State court is not subject to review by Federal courts in habeas corpus proceedings.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “very purpose of the criminal justice system is that of investigating, charging, trying, convicting and sentencing those who have committed offenses legislatively determined to be violative of the rights of persons and property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.