¶1Paul D. Moore, pro se.
¶2Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
¶3Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG, and DYER, Circuit Judges.
¶5The application for leave to appeal in forma pawperis is granted. The final order of the District Court, denying petitioner’s § 2255 application, is affirmed. Smedberg v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F.2d 401.
¶6Affirmed.