¶2Victor Arditti, El Paso, Tex., (Court appointed), for Clifton.
¶3Robert R. Bryan, Birmingham, Ala., amicus curiae.
¶4Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Has-kell Shelton, James E. Bock, Assts. U. S. Attys., for respondent-appellee.
¶9PER CURIAM:
¶10A jury convicted Horace Lemar Edwards of unlawfully carrying a pistol and of armed robbery on a military reservation. The same jury convicted Ronald Clifton on two counts of robbery at the same location as well as unlawfully carrying a pistol thereon, 18 U.S.C., § 13; Art. 1408 Vernon’s Ann. Texas Penal Code. We reverse, and remand for a new trial.
¶11The case for the prosecution rested upon identification furnished by the victims of the alleged robberies and upon the seizure of the weapons when the defendants were arrested. The defense was an alibi.
¶12Edwards and Clifton seek reversal on the following grounds: (1) because Edwards inadvertently entered a plea of guilty to the weapon charge in the presence of the jury; (2) the defendants were not allowed the correct number of peremptory challenges in the selection of the jury; (3) Edwards was denied his request for a polygraph examination; (4) there was no probable cause for the arrest of the defendants, which lead to the discovery of the weapons in question; and (5) the trial judge committed plain error in certain of his charges to the jury.
¶13As to the instructions given the jury this case is almost completely identical to the situation existing in United States v. Dillion, 5 Cir., 1971, 446 F.2d 598.
¶14Dillon is, therefore, controlling. Reversal for a new trial cannot be avoided.
¶15Reversed and remanded for a new trial.