Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 F.2d 210 - United States v. Cramer

United States v. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis

447 F.2d 210 · 1971

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1995 · most notably United States v. Kopituk (1982), United States v. Malinowski (1973)

34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

250197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holland v. United States · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Michelson v. United States · Dennis v. United States · Romano v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Who May be Present. Attorneys for the government, the witness under examination, interpreters when needed and, for the purpose of taking the evidence, a stenographer or operator of a recording device may be present while the grand jury is in session, but no person other than the jurors may be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““[A] defendant is not entitled to a reversal of his conviction simply because testimony before the grand jury which returned an indictment against him has not been recorded. This is the position taken by every court which has considered the problem . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “track down relevant leads furnished by the taxpayer -- leads reasonably susceptible of being checked, which, if true, would establish the taxpayer's innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.