United States v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
447 F.2d 278 · 1971
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 2002
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]ere the case to have been decided solely by appellant’s experts, the weight of their writings, their number of patients and their conclusions as to appellant’s “fugues’", “confabulation” and “disassociated state” would have tilted the scales overwhelmingly in appellant’s favor. But the decision was for the jury and there were many other witnesses including the defendant himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.