Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 F.2d 308 - United States v. Washington

United States v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

447 F.2d 308 · 1970

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 1998 · most notably United States v. William A. Hines, United States of America v. Theodore M. Ware (1972), United States v. Seawell (1977)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions

250197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Wingate Corp. · Balistrieri v. United States · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The ordinary on-the-scene confrontation also has great merit in that it operates at a time when the events and facts are fresh in mind and the accused ordinarily has no opportunity to change his clothing or personal appearance. All this is conducive to a high degree of accuracy in a form of identification that can at best be difficult when memories have been blurred by the passage of time and alleged suspects drastically change their appearance. Certainly, identifications conducted on the scene may contain certain elements of suggestiveness but this point can be argued to the jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.