Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 447 F.2d 358 - Melvin Carter v. John R. Carlson

Melvin Carter v. John R. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

447 F.2d 358 · 1971

Citation profile

337
cited by 337 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

126 federal appellate · 62 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 337 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2022 · most notably Parratt v. Taylor (1981), Butz v. Economou (1978)

126 federal appellate · 62 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 14 states

2630197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Monroe v. Pape · Pierson v. Ray · William Marbury v. James Madison · Screws v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 337 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determining whether a particular governmental function falls within the scope of official immunity,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the law is clear that an arresting officer has no immunity from suit for torts committed in the course of making an arrest”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State . . . subjects . . . any citizen of the United States . . . to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.