Mann v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
447 F.2d 533 · 1971
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2009
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elder v. Fisher · 144 Ind. App. 471 - Wozniczka v. McKEAN · 141 Ind. App. 42 - New York Central R. Co. v. CAVINDER, ETC. · Van Sickle v. Kokomo Water Works Co. · Bixenman v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[dJefendant makes several plausible, even persuasive, arguments for a more flexible rule on the contributory negligence of minors. But such arguments should be addressed to the Indiana courts; the federal district court had no choice but to apply the well-established Indiana law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.