No. 03-55824’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 655 F. Supp. 2d 1109 - Torres v. City of Madera (2009), 73 F. Supp. 3d 1133 - Jefferson v. City of Fremont (2014)
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiff can survive summary judgment without producing any evidence of discrimination beyond that constituting the prima facie case, if that evidence raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding the truth of the [actor's] proffered reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“showing that the employer's proffered explanation is 'unworthy of credence' because it is internally inconsistent or otherwise not believable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.