Van Duc Vo v. Benov’s Empirical Analysis
447 F.3d 1235 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2025
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. McConney · Quinn v. Robinson · United States v. Lui Kin-Hong · Barapind v. Enomoto · Ahmad v. Wigen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the extradition magistrate had jurisdiction over the individual sought, (2) the treaty was in force and the accused’s alleged offense fell within the treaty’s terms, and (3) there is ‘any competent evidence’ supporting the probable cause determination of the magistrate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he two types of exception [ie., mandatory and discretionary] are characterized by different language in extradition treaties. The use of “shall” language in a treaty indicates a provision constitutes a mandatory exception.... The use of “may” language in a treaty indicates a provision constitutes a discretionary exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patterson v. Wagner“sum of a few skirmishes with the police, coupled with a handful of explosions and bombing attempts around the Pacific Rim and a keen desire to see the downfall of the communist regime in his native land”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.